Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiller, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorGrabelsky, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorWagner, KC
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:30:06Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01
dc.identifier.other2134901
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/75990
dc.description.abstract[Excerpt] Psychosocial capacity building, which is a more common approach in response to disasters outside of Western Europe and the U.S., was, in part, a reaction against the perceived “traumatization” and pathologizing of disaster survivors, as well as the over-emphasis on the individual at the expense of the collectivity and community (Ager, 1997; IASC, 2007; Kleinman & Cohen, 1997; Miller, in press; Mollica, 2006; Strang & Ager, 2003; Summerfield 1995; 2000; Wessels, 1999; Wessels & Monteiro, 2006). The accent with psychosocial capacity building is equally on the social as well as the psychological. Some of the tenets of this approach are: an emphasis on families, groups and communities; focusing on strengths, capacities and sources of resiliency; a wariness of the medicalization of social reactions to abnormal situations; centralizing culture and its impact on meaning making after a disaster, expression of affect and its implications for healing; using local, indigenous, often non-professional people as the designers and implementers of projects; supporting and reconstructing mutual aid and self-help groups; taking into account socio-cultural variables such as race, class, and gender when considering the impact of a disaster and how to respond to it. Although there are clearly different points of emphasis, a mental health approach and psychosocial capacity building approach are not mutually exclusive and can be combined for effective, multi-systemic interventions to respond to disasters. There were elements of both approaches in the project described in this paper.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: Copyright held by Taylor & Francis. Final version published as: Miller, J., Grabelsky, J., & Wagner, K. C. (2010). Psychosocial capacity building in New York: Building resiliency with construction workers assigned to Ground Zero after 9/11. Social Groups in Work, 33(1), 23-40. Social Groups in Work is available online at http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subject9/11
dc.subjectdisasters
dc.subjectconstruction workers
dc.subjectpsychosocial capacity building
dc.titlePsychosocial Capacity Building in New York: Building Resiliency with Construction Workers Assigned to Ground Zero after 9/11
dc.typeunassigned
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01609510903191634
dc.description.legacydownloadsGrabelsky32_Psychosocial_Capacity.pdf: 560 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationMiller, Joshua: Smith College
local.authorAffiliationGrabelsky, Jeffrey: jmg30@cornell.edu Cornell University
local.authorAffiliationWagner, K. C.: kcw8@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics