Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHickey, Robert
dc.contributor.authorKuruvilla, Sarosh
dc.contributor.authorOhio State University
dc.description.abstractThe precipitous decline in union density and influence around the world has spawned a growing body of scholarship on union renewal. While this literature evidences lively debates regarding the efficacy of different renewal strategies, many argue that the path to renewal is paved through increased member activism. In this article, we question that premise. We examine the importance of rank-and-file union member activism in 44 cases of organizing campaigns in the United States and in the UK. Our review of these cases reveals little support for the notion that member activism is indispensable to union renewal in general, and successful organizing campaigns in particular. Our findings provide additional insight into the debate over top-down and bottom-up strategies for renewal, and raise several questions for future research regarding when, under what conditions, and under what rules worker activism matters for labour union renewal.
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Wiley. Final version published as: Hickey, R., Kuruvilla, S., & Lakhani, T. (2010). No panacea for success: Member activism, organizing and union renewal. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(1), 53-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00743.x Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectlabor unions
dc.subjectworker activism
dc.titleNo Panacea for Success: Member Activism, Organizing and Union Renewal
dc.description.legacydownloadsKuruvilla105_No_Panacea_for_Success.pdf: 730 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationHickey, Robert: Queen's University
local.authorAffiliationKuruvilla, Sarosh: Cornell University
local.authorAffiliationOhio State University: Ohio State University TRUE

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record