Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLipsky, David B.
dc.contributor.authorLamare, J. Ryan
dc.contributor.authorMaffie, Michael D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:26:18Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:26:18Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.identifier.other12370075
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/75837
dc.description.abstract[Excerpt] Using mandatory arbitration to resolve employment disputes has been a major source of controversy since the practice emerged about twenty‐five years ago. On one side of the debate have been proponents of the practice, who contend that mandatory pre‐dispute arbitration provides a faster and cheaper means of resolving employment disputes than relying on conventional litigation.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Wiley. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. Final version published as: Lipsky, D. B., Lamare, J. R., & Maffie, M. D. (2014). Mandatory employment arbitration: Dispelling the myths. Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, 32(9), 133-139. doi: 10.1002/alt.21546
dc.subjectmandatory arbitration
dc.subjectemployment disputes
dc.subjectlitigation
dc.subjectdispute resolution
dc.titleMandatory Employment Arbitration: Dispelling the Myths
dc.typearticle
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/alt.21546
dc.description.legacydownloadsLipsky124_Mandatory_employment_arbitration.pdf: 169 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationLipsky, David B.: dbl4@cornell.edu Cornell University
local.authorAffiliationLamare, J. Ryan: The Pennsylvania State University
local.authorAffiliationMaffie, Michael D.: Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics