JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Management Whipsawing: The Staging of Labor Competition under Globalization
dc.contributor.author | Greer, Ian | |
dc.contributor.author | Hauptmeier, Marco | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17T17:26:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-17T17:26:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.other | 10412536 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75830 | |
dc.description.abstract | The authors examine management whipsawing practices in the European auto industry based on more than 200 interviews and a comparison of three automakers. They identify four distinct ways in which managers stage competition between plants to extract labor concessions: informal, hegemonic, coercive, and rule-based whipsawing. Practices at the three auto firms differed from one another and changed over time because of two factors: structural whipsawing capacity and management labor relations strategy. In the context of economic globalization, whipsawing is an effective means for managers to extract concessions, to loosen national institutional constraints, and to diffuse employment practices internationally. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.rights | Required Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. | |
dc.subject | whipsawing | |
dc.subject | labor competition | |
dc.subject | labor relations | |
dc.subject | auto industry | |
dc.subject | multinational corporations | |
dc.subject | management strategy | |
dc.subject | globalization | |
dc.subject | European Works Councils | |
dc.subject | labor unions | |
dc.title | Management Whipsawing: The Staging of Labor Competition under Globalization | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.description.legacydownloads | Greer2_Management_Whipsawing.pdf: 408 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020. | |
local.authorAffiliation | Greer, Ian: icg2@cornell.edu Cornell University | |
local.authorAffiliation | Hauptmeier, Marco: Cardiff University |