Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorColvin, Alexander
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares management flexibility in employment decision-making in the United States and Canada through a cross-national survey of organizations in representative jurisdictions in each country, Pennsylvania and Ontario respectively, that investigates the impact of differences in their legal environments. The results indicate that, compared to their Ontario counterparts, organizations in Pennsylvania have a higher degree of flexibility in employment outcomes, such as higher dismissal and discipline rates, yet do not experience any greater flexibility or simplicity in management hiring and firing decisions. One explanation for this result may lie in the finding that organizations in Pennsylvania experience greater legal pressures on decision making, reflecting the generally more intense conflict in the employment law system in the United States. By contrast, high performance work systems, which some have looked to as a possible management-driven mechanism for enhancing fairness in employment, had more modest effects.
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Wiley. Final version published as: Colvin, A. J. S. (2006). Flexibility and fairness in liberal market economies: The comparative impact of the legal environment and high performance work systems. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(1), 73-97. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjecthigh performance work systems
dc.subjectemployment law
dc.titleFlexibility and Fairness in Liberal Market Economies: The Comparative Impact of the Legal Environment and High Performance Work Systems
dc.description.legacydownloadsColvin15_Flexibility_and_Fairness.pdf: 1310 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationColvin, Alexander: Cornell University

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record