Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEhrenberg, Ronald G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:20:43Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:20:43Z
dc.date.issued1997-01-01
dc.identifier.other4257925
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/75539
dc.description.abstract[Excerpt] CSWEP has long been concerned about the underrepresentation of women in faculty positions at major research universities. I have been charged by the committee with enumerating a set of policies that might enhance the attractiveness of research universities to female faculty. After presenting some data that suggest the magnitude of the underrepresentation problem, I do so below. In each case, I sketch the pros and cons of the policy. Although the focus is on increasing the attractiveness of research universities to female faculty, many of the policies would increase the attractiveness of academic careers per se to new female Ph.D.s if implemented in academia more broadly.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © American Economic Association. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjecthigher education
dc.subjectresearch universities
dc.subjectfemale faculty
dc.subjectunderrepresentation
dc.subjectpolicy
dc.titleEnhancing the Attractiveness of Research to Female Faculty
dc.typeunassigned
dc.description.legacydownloadsEhrenberg225_Enhancing_the_attractiveness.pdf: 59 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationEhrenberg, Ronald G.: rge2@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics