Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFriedman, Eli D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:20:06Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:20:06Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-01
dc.identifier.other6328531
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/75498
dc.description.abstractDrawing on qualitative fieldwork in China’s Guangdong and Zhejiang Provinces, the author asks how post-socialist unions respond to worker unrest and why the development of sectoral-level bargaining has been uneven in different regions of China. While Zhejiang has had relative success in establishing the organizational infrastructure for sectoral bargaining, Guangdong has had little success despite ongoing attempts by unions. The author explains variation in sectoral-level bargaining through an analysis of the different models of economic development, which are characterized as local entrepreneurialism and global integration for Zhejiang and Guangdong, respectively. Despite having different organizational forms, unions in both places suffer from a lack of credibility and capacity to enforce contracts. Given the ACFTU’s ongoing focus on sectoral-level bargaining, however, experiments will likely continue in various regions and industries throughout China.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjecteconomic development
dc.subjectlabor unions
dc.subjectsectoral-level bargaining
dc.titleEconomic Development and Sectoral Unions in China
dc.typeunassigned
dc.description.legacydownloadsFriedman11_Economic_Development_and_Sectoral_Unions_in_China_Final.pdf: 394 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationFriedman, Eli D.: edf48@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics