Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCompa, Lance A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:17:00Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:17:00Z
dc.date.issued2003-01-01
dc.identifier.other1787663
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/75243
dc.description.abstract[Excerpt] What is most needed is a new spirit of commitment by the labor law community and the government to give effect to both international human rights norms and the still-vital affirmation in the United States' own basic labor law of full freedom of association for workers. A way to begin fostering such a change of spirit is for the United States to ratify ILO conventions 87 and 98. This will send a strong signal to workers, employers, labor law authorities, and to the international community that the United States is serious about holding itself to international human rights and labor rights standards as it presses for the inclusion of such standards in new global and regional trade arrangements.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: Copyright held by Cornell University.
dc.subjectworker rights
dc.subjectlabor movement
dc.subjectunion organizing
dc.subjecthuman rights
dc.subjectfreedom of association
dc.titleWorkers’ Freedom of Association in the United States: The Gap Between Ideals and Practice
dc.typeunassigned
dc.description.legacydownloadsCompa110_Workers_Freedom.pdf: 1358 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationCompa, Lance A.: lac24@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics