Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Kati L.
dc.contributor.authorGleeson, Shannon
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:15:27Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:15:27Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-01
dc.identifier.other12020902
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/75074
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we propose that temporary immigrant workers in the United States face unique law-induced challenges to claimsmaking when compared to other categories of workers with precarious immigration statuses, such as unauthorized workers and H-2 guest workers. We present a systematic comparison of each group, drawing on a review of the existing literature and a new pilot study, to examine how the challenges facing each set of immigrants overlap in some ways, but are unique in others. We conclude that particular differences in U.S. immigration law categories (unauthorized, H-2 guest workers, and temporary immigrant workers) may shape how immigrants on the ground interact with broader legal regimes, such as criminal, employment, and administrative law. In turn, these differing legal institutional contexts affect how immigrants weigh the prospect of coming forward with a workplace law claim against their employers.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © University of Illinois College of Law. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjecttemporary immigrant workers
dc.subjectimmigration
dc.subjectworkplace law
dc.subjectclaims
dc.titleThe Precarity of Temporality: How Law Inhibits Immigrant Worker Claims
dc.typearticle
dc.description.legacydownloads39_1Griffith_Gleeson__1_.pdf: 308 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationGriffith, Kati L.: kategriffith@cornell.edu Cornell University
local.authorAffiliationGleeson, Shannon: smg338@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics