Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeivant, Danielen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-23T18:24:29Z
dc.date.available2007-04-23T18:24:29Z
dc.date.issued1979-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationhttp://techreports.library.cornell.edu:8081/Dienst/UI/1.0/Display/cul.cs/TR79-390en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/7504
dc.description.abstractFor a complexity measure $\kappa$, a set is $\kappa$-infinite if it contains a $\kappa$-decidable infinite subset. For a time-based $\kappa$, we prove that there is a recursive S s.t. both S and its complements, $\bar{S}$, are infinite but not $\kappa$-infinite. Lipton [6] states that the existence of a recursive set S s.t. neither S nor $\bar{S}$ os polynomially infinite is not a purely logical consequence of $\prod^{0}_{2}$ theorems of Peano's Arithmetic PA. His proof uses a construction of an algorithm within a non-standard model of of Arithmetic, in which the existence of infinite descending chains in such models is overlooked. We give a proof of a stronger statement to the effect that the existence of a recursive set S s.t. neither S nor $\bar{S}$ is linearly infinite is not a tautological consequence of all true $\prod^{0}_{2}$ assertions. We comment on other aspects of [6], and show $(\S 2)$ that a tautological consequence of true $\prod^{0}_{2}$ assertions may not be equivalent (in PA, say) to a $\prod^{0}_{2}$ sentence. The three sections of this paper use techniques of Recursion Theory, Proof Theory and Model Theory, respectively.en_US
dc.format.extent735667 bytes
dc.format.extent301737 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/postscript
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCornell Universityen_US
dc.subjectcomputer scienceen_US
dc.subjecttechnical reporten_US
dc.titleOn Easily Infinite Sets and On a Statement of R. Liptonen_US
dc.typetechnical reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics