Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCook, Maria Lorena
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:14:29Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:14:29Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01
dc.identifier.other3561901
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/74939
dc.description.abstractThis article identifies and explores the dilemma of migrant advocacy in advanced industrial democracies, focusing specifically on the contemporary United States. On the one hand, universal norms such as human rights, which are theoretically well suited to advancing migrants’ claims, may have little resonance within national settings. On the other hand, the debates around which immigration arguments typically turn, and the terrain on which advocates must fight, derive their values and assumptions from a nation-state framework that is self-limiting. The article analyzes the limits of human rights arguments, discusses the pitfalls of engaging in national policy debates, and details the challenges for advocates of advancing the cause of policy reform and shifting the frame for thinking about migration over the long term.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © University of Windsor. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectmigrant rights
dc.subjectadvocacy
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectimmigration
dc.subjecthuman rights
dc.subjectnational policy
dc.titleThe Advocate’s Dilemma: Framing Migrant Rights in National Settings
dc.typeunassigned
dc.description.legacydownloadsCook4_The_Advocate_s_Dilemma.pdf: 1282 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationCook, Maria Lorena: mlc13@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics