Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenson, Alan
dc.contributor.authorSajjadiani, Sima
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-12T19:47:50Z
dc.date.available2020-11-12T19:47:50Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-01
dc.identifier.other10466908
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/73170
dc.description.abstractShared bonus pools, in which a worker’s bonus depends both on a worker’s share of the pool (which serves as the incentive) and on the size of the pool (which is largely outside of the worker’s control), are a common method for distributing bonus pay. Using variation in the size of the bonus pool generated by a manufacturing plant’s gainsharing plan, which varies incentives for quality and worker engagement, we evaluate the conditions under which incentives distributed from bonus pools have incentive effects. Overall, results are cautionary: the evidence suggests gainsharing’s benefits operate outside of the incentive channel, and incentives may backfire if they are too small or too diluted by group performance metrics. Lastly, we illustrate how random variation in the size of bonus pools offers researchers a powerful, readily available, and underused tool for studying how workers respond to the availability and strength of incentives.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectincentives
dc.subjectbonus pools
dc.subjectgainsharing
dc.titleAre Bonus Pools Driven by their Incentive Effects? Evidence from Fluctuations in Gainsharing Incentives
dc.typepreprint
dc.description.legacydownloadsAre_Bonus_Pools_Driven_by_their_Incentive_Effects.pdf: 411 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationBenson, Alan: University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management
local.authorAffiliationSajjadiani, Sima: University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics