Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBronfenbrenner , Kate
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-12T19:32:44Z
dc.date.available2020-11-12T19:32:44Z
dc.date.issued1997-03-01
dc.identifier.other130441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/73162
dc.description.abstractToday, in the post-NAFTA climate of expanding trade agreements and skyrocketing levels of corporate migration, a majority of employers continue to make plant-closing threats during organizing campaigns. A recent study found that plant-closing threats continue to be among the most powerful anti-union strategies, and threats are even more pervasive than they were in 1993-95.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: Posted with permission of the Multinational Monitor.
dc.subjectplant
dc.subjectshutdown
dc.subjectclose
dc.subjectclosing
dc.subjectthreat
dc.subjectorganizing
dc.subjectunion
dc.subjectlaw
dc.subjectNLRB
dc.subjectcorporate
dc.subjectmigration
dc.subjectcampaigns
dc.subjectanti-union
dc.subjectstrategy
dc.titleRaw Power: Plant-Closing Threats and the Threat to Union Organizing
dc.typearticle
dc.description.legacydownloadsRaw_PowerProQuest_65428866.pdf: 342 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationBronfenbrenner , Kate: klb23@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics