Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorErickson, Christopher L.
dc.contributor.authorKuruvilla, Sarosh
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-12T19:32:40Z
dc.date.available2020-11-12T19:32:40Z
dc.date.issued1998-10-01
dc.identifier.other81585
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/73150
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the concept of “transformation” that many allege has occurred recently in a wide variety of national industrial relations systems. After a summary of the debate, with particular reference to the contentious case of Germany, the authors attempt to develop a definition of industrial relations system transformation on the basis of biological analogies and, in particular, the “punctuated equilibrium” theory. They examine the cases of the United States, Sweden, South Africa, and New Zealand, and conclude that the application of the biological frameworks raises a set of fundamental questions that must be addressed in order for the debate over the existence of industrial relations transformation to move forward.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: Copyright by Cornell University. Final paper published as: Erickson, C. L., & Kuruvilla, S. (1998). Industrial Relations System Transformation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52, 3-21.
dc.subjectindustrial relations
dc.subjectIR
dc.subjectGermany
dc.subjectSweden
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.subjectNew Zealand
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectgradual adaptation
dc.subjectpunctuated equilibrium
dc.titleIndustrial Relations System Transformation
dc.typearticle
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/001979399805200101
dc.description.legacydownloadsIndustrial_Relations_System_Transformation1998.pdf: 10556 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationErickson, Christopher L.: UCLA Anderson School of Management
local.authorAffiliationKuruvilla, Sarosh: sck4@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics