Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSturman, Michael C.
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, David
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-12T21:14:58Z
dc.date.available2020-09-12T21:14:58Z
dc.date.issued2006-01-01
dc.identifier.other5509354
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/72496
dc.description.abstractThis paper demonstrates how cost-benefit analysis can be used to develop a company's pay strategy. Using the case of Punk's Backyard Grill, a new venture starting in the Washington, DC area, quantitative aspects of Utility Analysis are combined with the judgments of the company's owners to provide estimates of the value associated with seven pay strategies. Results showed that leading the market by 5% produced the greatest return. Sensitivity analysis is used to see how drastically estimates changes owing to the nature of the paper's estimates. This methods presented in this paper should help others making pay policy decisions use cost-benefit analysis as part of their decision process.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Taylor & Francis. Final version published as: Sturman, M. C., & McCabe, D. (2006). Choosing whether to lead, lag, or match the market. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 7(1), 85-97. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectpay strategies
dc.subjectcost-benefit analysis
dc.subjectutility analysis
dc.subjectcompensation
dc.titleChoosing Whether to Lead, Lag, or Match the Market
dc.typearticle
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1300/J171v07n01_05
dc.description.legacydownloadsSturman50_Choosing_whether_to_lead.pdf: 15743 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationSturman, Michael C.: mcs5@cornell.edu Cornell University
local.authorAffiliationMcCabe, David: Punks Backyard Grill


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics