Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLynn, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMullen, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-12T21:12:18Z
dc.date.available2020-09-12T21:12:18Z
dc.date.issued1998-01-01
dc.identifier.other5032388
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/72357
dc.description.abstractBorchgrevink presented flawed arguments against our (Lynn & Mullen) previous recommendation that hospitality researchers employ meta-analytic techniques other than those of Hunter and Schmidt. The problems with his criticisms are briefly discussed in this article.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © SAGE. Final version published as: Lynn, M., & Mullen, B. (1998). A rebuttal to Borchgrevink’s criticism of our meta-analytic recommendations. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 22(1), 102-105. DOI: 10.1177/109634809802200110. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectfixed effects
dc.subjectrandom effects
dc.titleA Rebuttal to Borchgrevink’s Criticism of Our Meta-Analytic Recommendations
dc.typearticle
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/109634809802200110
dc.description.legacydownloadsLynn73_A_rebuttal.pdf: 81 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationLynn, Michael: wml3@cornell.edu Cornell University
local.authorAffiliationMullen, Brian: Syracuse University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics