A Rebuttal to Borchgrevink’s Criticism of Our Meta-Analytic Recommendations

Thumbnail
View/Open
PERMANENT LINK(S)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/72357
Collections
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Lynn, Michael; Mullen, Brian
Abstract
Borchgrevink presented flawed arguments against our (Lynn & Mullen) previous recommendation that hospitality researchers employ meta-analytic techniques other than those of Hunter and Schmidt. The problems with his criticisms are briefly discussed in this article.
Date Issued
1998-01-01
Subject
meta-analysis; fixed effects; random effects
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809802200110
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: © SAGE. Final version published as: Lynn, M., & Mullen, B. (1998). A rebuttal to Borchgrevink’s criticism of our meta-analytic recommendations. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 22(1), 102-105. DOI: 10.1177/109634809802200110. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Type
article

Statistics