Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLynn, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-12T21:08:00Z
dc.date.available2020-09-12T21:08:00Z
dc.date.issued1989-01-01
dc.identifier.other5502567
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/72077
dc.description.abstractRushton and Bogaert (1987) presented evidence of race differences in sexual behavior, sex-related physical characteristics, and sex-related physiological processes. They argued that these data supported a theory of genetic race differences in r/K reproductive strategies. Rushton and Bogaert’s (1987) article is criticized here on four grounds. First, they did not explain why natural selection would have favored different reproductive strategies for different races. Second, their data on race differences are of questionable validity because their literature review was selective and their original analyses were based on self-reports. Third, they provided no evidence that these race differences had significant effects on reproduction or that sexual restraint is a K characteristic. Finally, they did not adequately rule out environmental explanations for their data.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Elsevier. Final version published as: Lynn, M. (1989). Race differences in sexual behavior: A critique of Rushton and Bogaert’s evolutionary hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality, 23(1), 1-6. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectrace differences
dc.subjectsexual behavior
dc.subjectsex-related physical characteristics
dc.subjectnatural selection
dc.subjectreproductive strategies
dc.titleRace Differences in Sexual Behavior: A Critique of Rushton and Bogaert’s Evolutionary Hypothesis
dc.typearticle
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(89)90029-9
dc.description.legacydownloadsLynn77_Race_Differences.pdf: 780 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationLynn, Michael: wml3@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics