Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLynn, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-12T21:04:52Z
dc.date.available2020-09-12T21:04:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.identifier.other11334157
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/71776
dc.description.abstract[Excerpt] Peer review is an important part of the scientific process. It helps to separate good research from bad so that scarce journal pages and readers’ attention go the former rather than the latter. As editor of Cornell Hospitality Quarterly (CQ), I am particularly dependent on reviewers’ help because CQ is a cross-disciplinary journal whose submissions cover literatures and methodologies that vastly exceed my ken.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectCornell
dc.subjecteditorial
dc.subjectpublishing
dc.subjectempirical articles
dc.subjectwriting
dc.subjectpeer review
dc.titleCQ Reviewers’ Reactions to My Editorial Policies
dc.typearticle
dc.description.legacydownloadsLynn119_CQ_Reviewers.pdf: 87 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationLynn, Michael: wml3@cornell.edu Cornell University School of Hotel Administration


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics