Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Chris K.
dc.contributor.authorHan, Saram
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-12T21:04:06Z
dc.date.available2020-09-12T21:04:06Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.identifier.other11334174
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/71665
dc.description.abstractA recent Cornell Hospitality Quarterly article highlighted a unique natural experiment where an entire city had all its hotel delisted from all online travel agents for more than 4 years. The article provides great background to the delisting and highlights the impacts on hotel revenue and accommodation taxes for the county. The article estimates that even though the hotels relisted at all online travel agents (OTAs), there was a substantial gain to both hotels and accommodation tax collectors during the OTA delisting period. The impact estimates are based solely on the loss of demand realized in neighboring Phenix City, AL, once Columbus is relisted at OTAs. In the following, we highlight some concerns with these estimates and indicate that the losses may in fact be quite substantive and perhaps more indicative of why Columbus hotels relisted at the OTAs.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectdistribution
dc.subjectmarketing and sales
dc.subjectrevenue management
dc.subjectoperations
dc.subjecthotel management
dc.subjectoperations
dc.titleLiving Without OTAs—Goodbye Columbus: Putting the Jenie Back in the Bottle
dc.typearticle
dc.description.legacydownloadsAnderson46_Living_without_OTA.pdf: 402 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationAnderson, Chris K.: cka9@cornell.edu Cornell University School of Hotel Administration
local.authorAffiliationHan, Saram: Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics