Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYang, Sybil
dc.contributor.authorLynn, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-12T21:02:52Z
dc.date.available2020-09-12T21:02:52Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-01
dc.identifier.other6551200
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/71438
dc.description.abstractNinety-one different attempts to produce an attraction effect (involving a total of 23 product classes and 73 different decoyed choice-sets) produced only 11 reliable effects – significantly fewer than expected given the statistical power of our studies. Cross-scenario analyses indicated that use of meaningful qualitative-verbal descriptions, as well as pictorial depictions, to differentiate choice options substantially reduced the size of those effects. In fact, attraction effects were found at only chance levels using these types of stimuli. The implications of these findings for both marketing practice and research are briefly discussed.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © American Marketing Association. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectattraction effect
dc.subjectconsumer behavior
dc.subjectdecision making
dc.subjectdecoys
dc.subjectproduct positioning
dc.titleMore Evidence Challenging the Robustness and Usefulness of the Attraction Effect
dc.typearticle
dc.description.legacydownloadsLynn99_More_evidence_challenging.pdf: 1152 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationYang, Sybil: San Francisco State University
local.authorAffiliationLynn, Michael: wml3@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics