Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuisch, Benjamin Coe
dc.description182 pages
dc.description.abstractThe left-right political divide is among the most contentious in modern society, often eliciting more explicit acrimony than divisions based on race, religion, or social class. In this dissertation, I present three lines of research examining the ideological divide. This work illustrates the three main lenses through which I have approached the study of ideology, examining its causes, correlates and consequences. In the first series of studies I focus on the upstream causes of ideology, examining how individual differences in low-level physiological traits can influence a person’s political attitudes. In four studies (total N = 1,639) I provide evidence that genetically determined differences in gustatory (taste) sensitivity shape a person’s political ideology, with more taste-sensitive individuals tending to become more politically conservative. In the second line of research, I turn to the correlates of ideology, investigating how the same upstream factors that influence ideology can also shape other aspects of cognition for those on the left and right. In a series of 14 studies (total N = 4,595), I find that there are wide-ranging ideological differences in judgment and decision-making confidence, with political conservatives exhibiting greater metacognitive confidence across a broad range of judgment domains. I also find evidence that these differences in confidence are driven by the same upstream epistemic needs that shape political ideology. Finally, I consider the downstream consequences of ideology, examining how belonging to an ideological group, in turn, can influence a person’s cognition and behavior. In a series of 12 studies (total N = 9,917), I examine how shifting social norms among ideological ingroups reshaped Americans’ intergroup attitudes in the wake of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. I find evidence that Donald Trump’s political ascent substantially reshaped expressions of explicit prejudice among Americans—but that the direction of this change diverged sharply along ideological lines: conservatives (especially Trump supporters) showed significant increases in prejudice towards a wide range of minority groups. Liberals, conversely, showed significant decreases in prejudice over this same period. In conclusion, I consider some possible future research directions at the intersections of these three lines of work.
dc.subjectintergroup relations
dc.subjectpolitical ideology
dc.subjectsocial cognition
dc.titleExamining the Left-Right Divide: Causes, Correlates, and Consequences of Political Ideology
dc.typedissertation or thesis
dc.description.embargo2022-06-08 University of Philosophy D., Psychology
dc.contributor.chairFerguson, Melissa J.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPizarro, David A.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKrosch, Amy R.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGilovich, Thomas
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGoldstein, Michael H.

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record