Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoebus, Freya
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-15T15:27:56Z
dc.date.available2021-06-05T06:00:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-30
dc.identifier.otherMoebus_cornellgrad_0058F_11446
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/cornellgrad:11446
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 11050186
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/67205
dc.description.abstractWhy do we sometimes fail to do the right thing? Socrates is known for his intellectualistic answer to this question: wrongdoers are ignorant. I argue that Socrates' longer explanation of wrongdoing also assigns importance to our non-rational mental states, i.e., our emotions, appetites, pleasures, and pains. In a Socratic account, non-rational states are felt evaluations that can influence our beliefs about what is best to do and, thereby, influence our actions. While someone who knows what is good and bad does not take her non-rational states to be true, the ignorant person takes them to be true, and so she fails to do the right thing.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectEmotions
dc.subjectKnowledge
dc.subjectPlato
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectApperance
dc.subjectIgnorance
dc.subjectWrongdoing
dc.titleSocratic therapy for the criminal, the glutton, and the coward.
dc.typedissertation or thesis
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophy
thesis.degree.grantorCornell University
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.namePh.D., Philosophy
dc.contributor.chairBrennan, Theodore R.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBrittain, Charles Francis
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKamtekar, Rachana
dcterms.licensehttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7298/89ky-db10


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics