Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCracken, Peter
dc.contributor.authorChandler, Adam
dc.contributor.authorKoennecke, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorMobley, Liisa
dc.contributor.authorChapman Tripp, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorThitchener, Lynn
dc.contributor.authorWright, Sarah J.
dc.contributor.authorKidwell, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorShea, Alison
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-20T18:45:43Z
dc.date.available2019-05-20T18:45:43Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-21
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/66089
dc.description.abstractWith CUL’s planned move to FOLIO for library resource management, it makes sense to consider implementing EBSCO’s Discover Service (EDS) and related electronic resources management (ERM) tools, as they will integrate more closely with FOLIO than does our Discovery and ERM solution from Ex Libris, Summon and Intota. Separate groups worked to assess the pros and cons from both a user services and technical services perspective. After considered analysis, the groups’ consensus is to recommend that CUL shift to the EBSCO-based discovery and ERM services.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCornell University Library Executive Groupen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleUser Services and Technical Services Analysis of Ex Libris vs EBSCO Discovery Layer and Electronic Resources Management Toolsen_US
dc.typereporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics