Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAcorn, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T14:00:14Z
dc.date.available2021-01-02T07:01:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-30
dc.identifier.otherAcorn_cornellgrad_0058F_11133
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/cornellgrad:11133
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 10758017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/64877
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines international law and cooperation to combat bribery in international business, specifically the OECD’s 1997 Anti-Bribery Convention and the criminalization of foreign bribery—the bribery of government officials of other states to obtain a business advantage. Moving away from questions of compliance with international law that focus on conformity with a prescribed obligation, the project examines the influence of the Convention through its national implementation in four prominent OECD states—Canada, the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom. The dissertation draws on extensive documentary and interview data to catalogue the varied national anti-foreign bribery policy paradigms that these states have developed in response to their shared international obligation. These range from a traditional criminal law paradigm to a regulatory policy paradigm, which demonstrate marked differences from enforcement practices to policy goals. The dissertation shows how international law necessarily moves through—and is shaped by—pre-existing institutions and practices within the state. Bridging historical institutionalism and international relations literature on state socialization, I argue that distinct national policy legacies in governing business produce these particular national anti-foreign bribery policy paradigms. Further, the dissertation documents the continued significance of these national policy paradigms as they mediate efforts by norm promoters to improve adherence to the OECD Convention. This research has important implications for how we assess the OECD Convention and international law more generally, and it highlights the multiple pathways of influence and ongoing engagement of international law. Ultimately, It raises questions about the degree of equivalence that we can expect in the application of international law in domestic legal orders, even among similarly situated states with significant regulatory capacity.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectPolicy paradigms
dc.subjectInternational relations
dc.subjectGovernance
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectinternational law
dc.subjectAnti-corruption law
dc.subjectInternational business
dc.subjectInternational organizations
dc.subjectOECD 1997 Anti-Bribery Convention
dc.titleThe Criminalization of Bribery in International Business: Implementing the 1997 OECD Anti-Bribery Convention
dc.typedissertation or thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineGovernment
thesis.degree.grantorCornell University
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.namePh. D., Government
dc.contributor.chairKatzenstein, Peter Joachim
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEvangelista, Matthew Anthony
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLienau, Odette
dcterms.licensehttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7298/ypb0-qz18


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics