Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, Mingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-23T16:53:13Z
dc.date.available2007-04-23T16:53:13Z
dc.date.issued1984-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationhttp://techreports.library.cornell.edu:8081/Dienst/UI/1.0/Display/cul.cs/TR84-636en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/6475
dc.description.abstractNew techniques for obtaining lower bounds on string-matching problems are developed and we prove the following new results. String-matching cannot be performed by a three-head one-way deterministic finite automaton. This answers the $k=3$ case of the open question, due to Galil and Seiferas [GS], whether a $k$-head one-way deterministic finite automaton can perform string-matching. String-matching by a k-head two-way DFA with k-1 heads blind (can only see two end symbols) is studied, tight upper and lower bounds are provided. Probabilistically moving a string on one tape (requiring $n^{2}$ time) is harder than probabilistically matching two strings on 1 tape. Notice that this is not true for deterministic or even nondeterministic TMs. This is the first result showing that checking is easier than generating.en_US
dc.format.extent1534716 bytes
dc.format.extent307828 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/postscript
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCornell Universityen_US
dc.subjectcomputer scienceen_US
dc.subjecttechnical reporten_US
dc.titleLower Bounds on String-Matchingen_US
dc.typetechnical reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics