Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlack, Christina S.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T13:35:11Z
dc.date.available2018-10-23T13:35:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-30
dc.identifier.otherBlack_cornellgrad_0058F_11112
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/cornellgrad:11112
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 10489807
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59711
dc.description.abstractMy readings of the abundant ingestion and excretion themes in literary works by Fielding, Swift, Montagu, and Pope propose that we can understand these topics as sustained metaphors for the bipartite issues of readers' consumption and writers' incorporation of a literary heritage into these texts. These issues were particularly salient in early eighteenth-century Britain, as printed texts become more broadly available and affordable, and readers could no longer be relied upon to have a top education and sophisticated tools of analysis. Authors like Fielding and Swift also were experimenting in new forms like the novel that had no standards for analysis. These authors were interested in and concerned about how their work and that of their contemporaries would stand up to future scrutiny. How did the changing economic incentives for writing, from courting wealthy patrons to selling in mass volume to unknown readers, affect literature’s claim to everlasting value? Pope was the first English author to earn a sustainable living from his writings, but that new economic viability also spawned Grub Street hack writing, not to mention unsavory publishing practices. In this historical context, sustained metaphors of eating and digesting were a playfully denigrating way for these writers to investigate what it meant to write for consumers, even as the metaphors also revivified older literary traditions and genres by incorporating them into modern contexts. The coda includes interpretations of contemporary fecal art pieces "Cloaca" by Wim Delvoye and "Vorm-Fellows-Attitude" by artist collective Gelatin.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectEnglish literature
dc.subjectAppetite
dc.subjectDigestion
dc.subjectFielding
dc.subjectPope
dc.subjectSwift
dc.subjectArt criticism
dc.subjectWaste
dc.titleWits, Shits, and Crits: The Problem of Digestive Interpretation in Pope, Swift, and Fielding
dc.typedissertation or thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineEnglish Language and Literature
thesis.degree.grantorCornell University
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.namePh. D., English Language and Literature
dc.contributor.chairBogel, Fredric Victor
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSaccamano, Neil Charles
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGoldstein, Amanda Jo
dcterms.licensehttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7298/X4891437


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics