Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmbrozik, Caitlin
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T13:23:03Z
dc.date.available2020-06-04T06:02:17Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-30
dc.identifier.otherAmbrozik_cornellgrad_0058F_10853
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/cornellgrad:10853
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 10489527
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59442
dc.description.abstractIn 2011, the Obama administration announced a national countering violent extremism(CVE) strategy, which tasked local communities to work together to design and implement their own CVE programs to help prevent the threat of violent extremism. Seven years later, the majority of Americans do not know what "CVE" is and few programs exist at the local level. This project examines the U.S. approach to CVE and the challenges local stakeholders faced while attempting to design and implement "community-led" CVE programming. In examining these challenges, I explore why only some communities have responded to the federal government's call for action to design and implement CVE programming and created what I term CVE governance networks. I find that three factors -community stakeholder interest in CVE, capacity to mobilize and facilitation-explain the variation in mobilization at the local level in the United States. However, the creation of a CVE governance network does not necessarily mean that the network will develop and implement CVE programs. Local community stakeholders face numerous challenges throughout the policymaking process, which ultimately hinders implementation efforts. Often, governance networks succumb to internal political conflicts that are fueled by stakeholder disagreements over how CVE programming should be implemented within their communities. Given this, I find that networks with a local leader who is able to both facilitate coordination and make final implementation decisions tend to be more successful in implementing collaborative programming. Evidence from interviews and surveys of stakeholders involved in the CVE policymaking process lends support for my theory of local level collaborative policymaking and reveals the intricacies of the CVE policymaking process.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectInternational relations
dc.subjectCountering Violent Extremism
dc.subjectCounterterrorism
dc.titleCountering Violent Extremism Locally
dc.typedissertation or thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineGovernment
thesis.degree.grantorCornell University
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.namePh. D., Government
dc.contributor.chairPepinsky, Thomas
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRoberts, Kenneth
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWay, Christopher Robert
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKreps, Sarah E.
dcterms.licensehttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7298/X49Z935M


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Statistics