Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeschkow, Alisha
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-03T19:27:03Z
dc.date.available2018-10-03T19:27:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-30
dc.identifier.otherMeschkow_cornell_0058O_10259
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/cornell:10259
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 10474115
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59012
dc.description.abstractJurors have duties to follow strict interpretations of the law when making decisions about defendant guilt. However, jurors are not blank slates – by the time trial has started, eligible jurors (i.e. adults) have already accumulated strong senses of gist (intuition) built upon experience, emotion, and moral reasoning irrespective of the law. We investigate the impact of verbatim (violations of rote legal definitions) and gist (bottom-line or essence) manipulations of rape on juror decision-making. Despite jury instructions, we predict that legal verdicts will be influenced by gist. Conversely, we predict that verbatim manipulations will influence personal assignments of guilt such that scenarios that violate the law will be judged as more immoral or personally violating. The first experiment measured responses to scenarios involving alcohol (N = 158) and scenarios involving age disparities (N = 206). Participants received one of four combinations of two cases, giving two verdicts per case, resulting in 4 total responses. These verdicts corresponded to whether the actions in the scenario rose to the level of rape legally and personally - participants gave hard legal verdicts (guilty and not guilty) as if participants were on a jury, and personal verdicts that corresponded to personal expectations of rape (still coded as guilty/not guilty). The presence of verbatim violations and gist violations of rape both significantly increased the rate of legal and personal verdicts, implying that 1) the gist of rape inflates legal guilty verdicts and 2) written law inflates personal opinions of what qualifies as rape while controlling for rape myth acceptance (endorsement of myths related to sexual assault and aggression). Experiment 2 (N = 258) improved upon the methods of Experiment 1. The age scenario was revised, and scenarios related to coercion and deception replaced alcohol. Overall, age-related scenarios were more influenced by verbatim, and coercion and deception were more overall influenced by gist. Follow-up studies with gender, survivor status, and law enforcement are suggested for informing relevant policy.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectdecision-making
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectrape
dc.subjectjudgment
dc.subjectLaw
dc.titleWhen Cases Fit the Gist of Rape But Not the Verbatim Definition (and Vice Versa): A Fuzzy-trace Theory of Jurors' Judgments of Guilt
dc.typedissertation or thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineHuman Development
thesis.degree.grantorCornell University
thesis.degree.levelMaster of Arts
thesis.degree.nameM.A., Human Development
dc.contributor.chairReyna, Valerie
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCeci, Stephen John
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHans, Valerie
dcterms.licensehttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7298/X48K778R


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics