Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Dabin
dc.contributor.authorTomek, William G.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T17:09:34Z
dc.date.available2018-08-21T17:09:34Z
dc.date.issued2004-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/57806
dc.descriptionWP 2004-07 May 2004
dc.description.abstractEndogenous variables in structural models of agricultural commodity markets are typically treated as stationary. Yet, tests for unit roots have rather frequently implied that commodity prices are not stationary. This seeming inconsistency is investigated by focusing on alternative specifications of unit root tests. We apply various specifications to Illinois farm prices of corn, soybeans, barrows and gilts, and milk for the 1960 through 2002 time span. The preponderance of the evidence suggests that nominal prices do not have unit roots, but under certain specifications, the null hypothesis of a unit root cannot be rejected, particularly when the logarithms of prices are used. If the test specification does not account for a structural change that shifts the mean of the variable, the results are biased toward concluding that a unit root exists. In general, the evidence does not favor the existence of unit roots.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherCharles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University
dc.subjectcommodity price
dc.subjectunit root tests
dc.titleCommodity Prices and Unit Root Tests
dc.typearticle
dcterms.licensehttp://hdl.handle.net/1813/57595


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Working Papers
    Working Papers published by the Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University

Show simple item record

Statistics