Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiaukonyte, Jura
dc.contributor.authorRickard, Bradley J.
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, Harry M.
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Timothy J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T17:09:19Z
dc.date.available2018-08-21T17:09:19Z
dc.date.issued2010-10-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/57740
dc.descriptionWP 2010-19 October 2010
dc.description.abstractWe investigate consumer response to various types of advertising for fruits and vegetables—a food category which health officials uniformly agree is significantly underconsumed in the United States. Using an adult, non-student subject pool of participants in the experiment, consumers’ response to different broad-based (not used currently in the United States) and commodity-specific (widely used in the United States) advertising campaigns for various fruits and vegetables is empirically measured. We show that broad-based advertising effects far exceed those of the commodity-specific advertising and discuss the implications of the effective fruit and vegetable advertising programs on caloric intake and obesity management policies.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherCharles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University
dc.titleEvaluating advertising strategies for fruits and vegetables and the implications for obesity in the United States
dc.typearticle
dcterms.licensehttp://hdl.handle.net/1813/57595


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Dyson School Working Papers
    Working Papers published by the Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University

Show simple item record

Statistics