Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWelsh, Rick
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-08T18:47:32Z
dc.date.available2017-06-08T18:47:32Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1813/51466
dc.description.abstractRobust intellectual property protection for GE technologies stimulated a shift in agricultural chemical companies toward “an integrated pesticide and seed sector” that over a relatively short time has concentrated the seed industry into a few large companies. This evolution in the biotech industry has, in part, contributed to a polarized dialogue around technological changes in the food system, especially in the US. Proponents and opponents of the technology each have common viewpoints that frame the issues in support of their perspective. Concerns of GE critics include the lack of safety data for the consumer, insufficient government regulation, and potential ecological impacts. GE advocates, including policy makers, focus on the contributions of the technology to food security and environmental sustainability. The conflicting strategies of the two sides are not contributing to greater social consensus on GE technology in the food system.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNABC
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAgricultural biotechnology
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectstewardship
dc.subjectgenetical engineering
dc.subjectGMO
dc.subjectGE crops
dc.subjectresistance
dc.subjectresistance management
dc.subjectcoexistence
dc.subjectseed industry
dc.subjectlabeling
dc.subjectinsect resistance
dc.titleUnderstanding the social controversies over agricultural Biotechnology
dc.typebook chapter


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND

Statistics