Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJaffe, Greg
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-08T18:47:29Z
dc.date.available2017-06-08T18:47:29Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/51451
dc.description.abstractCoexistence raises complex management, policy, economic, and consumer issues. Jaffe postulates that coexistence “embodies the idea that consumers should be able to get the products they want.” It is a complex issue and it predates GE crops. It is important to understand the functional meaning of the term coexistence in the current context of biotech, organic, and conventionally produced crops. Coexistence only involves relationships within a specific, legally approved crop plant that can be produced by different farming practices and for different uses “with a specific market goal.” Most controversy today concerns the coexistence of biotech crops with conventional or organically produced crops.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNABC
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAgricultural biotechnology
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectstewardship
dc.subjectgenetical engineering
dc.subjectGMO
dc.subjectGE crops
dc.subjectresistance
dc.subjectresistance management
dc.subjectcoexistence
dc.subjectseed industry
dc.subjectlabeling
dc.subjectinsect resistance
dc.titleCoexistence of biotech, organic, and conventional crops: Facts, issues, and a path forward
dc.typebook chapter


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Statistics