Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWelsh, Rick
dc.contributor.authorErvin, David
dc.contributor.authorGlenna, Leland
dc.contributor.authorBuccola, Steven
dc.contributor.authorYang, Hui
dc.contributor.authorLacy, William
dc.contributor.authorBiscotti, Dina
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-08T13:05:36Z
dc.date.available2017-06-08T13:05:36Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/51245
dc.description.abstractAccording to Rick Welsh—based on a recently completed study—industry funding generally brings modestly less basic and more excludable (e.g. patentable) research than does NSF or NIH funding. Industry is wary of the decline in the level of basic research at universities, but contributes to it through its funding relationships. This points to the importance to a number of parties of continuing to publicly fund basic research at universities
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNABC
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAgricultural biotechnology
dc.subjecttechnology transfer
dc.subjectintellectual property
dc.subjectregulation
dc.subjectgenetic engineering
dc.subjectpublic good
dc.subjectbioethics
dc.subjectskill development
dc.subjectpublic funding, industry funding
dc.titleAgricultural biotechnology and university-industry research relationships: Views of university scientists and administrators and industry
dc.typebook chapter


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Statistics