Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBauder, Ward
dc.description.abstractFor years an argument for excluding hired farm workers from the unemployment insurance program was what the seasonal nature of agricultural employment would make the program too costly. A recent 15-state study of the feasibility of agricultural coverage indicated that average cost rates for agriculture would not be substantially different from cost rates in nonagricultural industries. But, it did support the contention that costs for seasonal agricultural labor are substantially higher than costs for nonseasonal agricultural labor (2,3).en_US
dc.format.extent1394466 bytes
dc.publisherNew York State Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNew York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletinen_US
dc.subjectseasonal emplyment costsen_US
dc.subjectseasonal agricultural employmenten_US
dc.titleThe Costs of Seasonal Agricultural Employmenten_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Food and Life Sciences Bulletin
    New York's Food and Life Sciences (FLS) Bulletin reports new developments in fruit and vegetable breeding, performance, diseases, and integrated pest management. It is of interest to researchers and the public.

Show simple item record