Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKalaitzandonakes, Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T13:59:32Z
dc.date.available2017-05-24T13:59:32Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/50008
dc.description.abstractMarket failure is the predominant justification for regulatory interventions of all kinds. Potential market failure has also been the basic argument behind calls for mandatory labeling of GM foods. However, there is little empirical evidence to suggest that any of the necessary and sufficient conditions for mandatory labeling of GM foods is satisfied. Indeed, it is possible that mandatory GM-food labeling policies installed in some countries could fail all three standard criteria used to justify regulatory intervention. The efficiency of various mandatory labeling regimes has not been sufficiently appraised. Proper methods for measuring consumer behavior and relevant social benefits from mandatory labeling have been ignored and he costs of mandatory labeling policies brushed aside.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNABC
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAgricultural biotechnology
dc.subjectstakeholders
dc.subjectpublic concern
dc.subjectrisk
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectlabeling
dc.subjectpatents
dc.subjectintellectual property
dc.subject
dc.titleRegulating biotechnology: gm food labels
dc.typebook chapter


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Statistics