Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFox, Michael W.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-17T18:54:32Z
dc.date.available2017-05-17T18:54:32Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/49739
dc.description.abstractThere are ethical and religious, legal and political, social and economic, environmental and cultural dimensions to animal biotechnology. When these are ignored, the gap between private/corporate and public interests widens. This concern does not represent anti-science or anti-progress leanings, but a more informed public. Patenting of the techniques of biotechnology, rather than its products, including transgenic animals would be more acceptable.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNABC
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAgricultural biotechnology
dc.subjectanimal biotechnology
dc.subjectbioethics
dc.subjectanimal well-being
dc.subjectfood safety
dc.subjectscience communication
dc.subjectagricultural indistry
dc.subjectconsumers sentimen
dc.subject
dc.titleThe new creation: An update on animal gene engineering
dc.typebook chapter


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Statistics