Published 2001 by NABC.

While agricultural biotechnology has potential benefits for farmers, consumers and the environment, public outcry has focused on its problems—extreme views on either side are detrimental to all with those claiming that all applications of agricultural biotechnology are bad falling into one kind of trap, but those who assert that biotechnology will provide all the answers fall into another. Some of this is due to poor communication skills of scientists and how they communicate with the public. They are cautious, hesitant to extrapolate, and generally unprepared to deliver sound bites. But the public is interested in questions such as: Is agricultural biotechnology moral? Is it fair, or does it exploit? Does it cause society to lose control?

Historically, new technologies, especially when the public does not understand them, are viewed with suspicion and introduction may be delayed with negative consequences to the public. Decisions about risk management were not influenced by the public in the past, but that is no longer the case. Public perception can be influenced when community leaders become involved in educational efforts. Farmers, on the other hand, see biotechnology as primarily a management tool that will be accepted if it makes economic sense.

Cultural and historical differences in perception, as well as different needs, inhibit a unified approach to biotechnology between the US, Europe and the developing world.

Recent Submissions

  • A Legal View: Promoting product stewardship and regulation 

    Abramson, Stanley H. (NABC, 2001)
    Recommendations for improving product stewardship and federal regulations.
  • Appendix I: Script for the mock debate 

    Lila Smith, Mary Ann; Scanes, Colin (NABC, 2001)
    Script for he mock debate that was presented to introduce the theme and structure of the workshop sessions.
  • Ethics and genetically modified foods 

    Comstock, Gary (NABC, 2001)
    The author has decided that it is ethically justifiable to pursue genetically modified crops and foods because the following three of our most influential ethical traditions converge on a common answer: the rights of people ...
  • Appendix II Partisan assessments of information concerning genetically modified foods: Preliminary results 

    Gunther, Albert C.; Schmitt, Kathleen (NABC, 2001)
    Research into the effect mass media has on partisan assessment of received information
  • The food industry 

    Harland, Susan (NABC, 2001)
    The United States Food and Drug Administration considers GM crops to be “substantially equivalent” to their traditional counterparts. This means that they can be managed simply as commodities in this country. On the other ...
  • Genetic engineering and the concept of the natural 

    Sagoff, Mark (NABC, 2001)
    Many consumers view genetically engineered foods with suspicion partly because the food industry has taught them to do so. Consumers learn from advertisements and labels that the foods they buy are all natural only to ...
  • What the EU wants the US to understand about European biotech imports 

    Van Der Haegen, Antoine (NABC, 2001)
    Globalization, while offering the advantages of increasing trade, prosperity, and choice, has created problems and new uncertainties. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture have been available for about ten ...
  • A scientist’s perspective: The international arena 

    Krattiger, Anatole F. (NABC, 2001)
    We need a good idea to bring about the change needed to make biotechnology flourish and deliver its promise to the world’s citizens at large. Biotechnology is at the heart of the long-term sustainability of our environment, ...
  • A farmer’s perspective: Producing food and fiber for an unforgiving world 

    Erickson, David C. (NABC, 2001)
    The biotechnology industry failed to make the system transparent, and failed to get all of the “stakeholders” involved. Farmers need predictability in the products they buy and that they can sell them. This means there is ...
  • The European situation 

    Toet, Dirk-Arie (NABC, 2001)
    The European perspective on current and future trends in agricultural biotechnology

View more

Statistics

RSS Feeds