Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoldfrank, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorSchrank, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-27T16:51:46Z
dc.date.available2017-01-27T16:51:46Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/45887
dc.descriptionPrepared for delivery at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30th - September 3, 2006.en_US
dc.description.abstractIdentifies two different urban policy regimes in Latin America—neoliberal and socialist—and traces their origins to the distinct interests and capacities of local elites and activists in the region’s cities in the mid-to-late twentieth century. While agricultural and commercial interests paid a high price for the growth of import-substituting industrialization, and therefore deployed free trade zones (and similar institutions) in traditional export centers in the 1960s and 1970s, their industrial rivals bore the brunt of austerity and adjustment in the free market era, and therefore adopted compensatory measures designed to increase the “social wage” in the 1980s and 1990s. Examples are drawn from municipalities in Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Uruguay, and Venezuela and call the conventional portrait of impotent Latin American cities—and omnipotent central governments—into question.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.hasversionLater published as BENJAMIN GOLDFRANK and ANDREW SCHRANK, Municipal Neoliberalism and Municipal Socialism: Urban Political Economy in Latin America. Volume 33.2, June 2009, 443–62, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.en_US
dc.subjectGoldfranken_US
dc.subjectSchranken_US
dc.subjectLatin Americaen_US
dc.subjectCitiesen_US
dc.subjectMunicipal Socialismen_US
dc.subjectNeoliberalismen_US
dc.titleMunicipal Neoliberalism and Municipal Socialism: Urban Political Economy in Latin Americaen_US
dc.typepresentationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics