Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHofer, Franzen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-31T19:44:00Z
dc.date.available2017-12-20T07:00:23Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-20en_US
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 7959748
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/31032
dc.description.abstractDespite having undergone similar experiences of warfare and facing similar anxieties about the future, Germany and Japan evolved divergent responses to commemorating the Second World War over the course of the postwar period. This dissertation explores how different cultures and generational cohorts respond to the challenges of commemorating violent and traumatic pasts in response to shifting domestic concerns and to post-Cold War international geopolitical transformations. Four recently completed or revamped memorial sites form the backdrop of the discussion and provide insights into the politics of memory in postwar Germany and Japan: the Topography of Terror (2010) and the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe (2005) in Berlin; and the Yûshûkan (2002) and the Shôwakan (1999) in Tokyo. Over the course of the 'memory boom' of the 1980s and 1990s, debates about both the architectural expression of a museum or monument and the contents to be exhibited within the confines of the museum became lightning rods for public perceptions about the past in the present. As an affectively-charged place within the urban fabric, the memorial site, consisting of its intermingling of image and text installed in a visual narrative unfolding in space, offers a unique perspective from which to explore the performative dimensions of national identity formation. A key question this dissertation seeks to answer is how individuals are affected by their encounters with images, captions, and media that constitute museal representations of past events - in short, how affective dynamics undergird and influence the visitor's aesthetic experience of memorial sites. Central to this relationship between aesthetics, affect, and experience manifested in museal display is authenticity. Through the lens of comparison, this dissertation contributes an understanding of how the curators, activists, trustees, and politicians involved with the fashioning of memorial sites use (and sometimes abuse) the discourse of authenticity to produce an experience of the past in line with a particular conception of national identity, and how visiting publics respond to these representations of the past.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectModern German and Japanese Historyen_US
dc.subjectCultural and Visual Studiesen_US
dc.subjectMuseums and Memorial Sitesen_US
dc.titleMemorial Sites And The Affective Dynamics Of Historical Experience In Berlin And Tokyoen_US
dc.typedissertation or thesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineHistory
thesis.degree.grantorCornell Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.namePh. D., History
dc.contributor.chairLacapra, Dominick Cen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKoschmann, Julien Victoren_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSakai, Naokien_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHull, Isabel Virginiaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics