Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerzack, Antonyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-28T20:53:56Z
dc.date.available2012-06-28T20:53:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-08-31en_US
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 7745002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/29112
dc.description.abstractLittle research has been done to determine whether the cues to deception researched by academia and delivered to law enforcement agencies are equally useful for detecting both skilled and unskilled liars. This study investigated the effects of deceptive skill on six linguistic variables including parts of speech and emotional affect. Data was gathered from transcripts of a deceptive group communication task conducted in an online synchronous chat environment. An analysis of transcripts confirmed that liars can be distinguished from truth-tellers, and revealed that skill is also a factor affecting language patterns. Analyzed with a Mixed Model ANOVA, first-person pronouns, second-person pronouns, and conjunctions all showed a main effect for role, distinguishing liars from truth-tellers. Furthermore, skilled liars were found to use fewer words, first- and second-person pronouns, and conjunctions in synchronous chat.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectdeceptionen_US
dc.subjectlyingen_US
dc.subjectdeception skillen_US
dc.titleLanguage Use Of Successful Liarsen_US
dc.typedissertation or thesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineCommunication
thesis.degree.grantorCornell Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelMaster of Science
thesis.degree.nameM.S., Communication
dc.contributor.chairByrne, Sahara E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFussell, Susan R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHancock, Jeffrey T.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics