JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Circumstantial and Temporal Dependence in Counterfactual Modals

Author
Abusch, Dorit
Abstract
“Counterfactual” readings of might/could have were previously analyzed using metaphysical modal bases. This paper presents examples and scenarios where the assumptions of such a branching-time semantics are not met, because there are facts at the base world that exclude the complement of the modal becoming true. Additional arguments show that counterfactual readings are context-dependent. These data motivate a semantics using a circumstantial (or factual) modal base, which refers to context-dependent facts about a world and time. The analysis is formulated in a version of the premise semantics for modality.
Description
Final pre-publication version of a paper to appear in Natural Language Semantics.
Date Issued
2012-02-19Subject
metaphysical modality; circumstantial modality; premise semantics; interactions between tense and modality; branching time; natural language semantics
Related Version
Earlier version circulated on Semantics Archive, http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/2NhNGNlZ/, 15-Jun-2008.
Type
article