Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Jasonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-28T17:19:48Z
dc.date.available2014-07-01T06:11:37Z
dc.date.issued2011-05en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/23104
dc.description.abstractThe current study examined the impact of varying degrees of exclusion and overinclusion on mood and the needs for belonging and control. Participants played an online ball tossing game with two computerized confederates in which they were initially included, then gradually excluded or overincluded. Participants in the exclusion condition suffered a reduction in mood and impaired psychological needs (belonging, control). This effect was evident after receiving four (7.4%) fewer tosses than when included. Overinclusion resulted in improved psychological needs, but not mood. Rejection sensitivity (RS) did not moderate the effect of exclusion, demonstrating the negative and highly detectable nature of exclusion. RS, however, did moderate the effect of overinclusion, such that high RS individuals experienced improved mood and psychological needs, whereas low RS individuals did not. Implications for future research are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectexclusionen_US
dc.subjectoverinclusionen_US
dc.subjectrejection sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectindividual differencesen_US
dc.titleThe Cost of Exclusion and the Benefit of Overinclusion: Individual Differences Moderate Sensitivity to Inclusionary Statusen_US
dc.typedissertation or thesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics