Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurkhauser, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-09T18:00:31Z
dc.date.available2010-06-09T18:00:31Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Human Biology, 7 (2009): 307-318en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/15082
dc.description.abstractThere are several ways to measure fatness and obesity, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The primary measure for tracking the prevalence of obesity has historically been body mass index (BMI). This paper compares long-run trends in the prevalence of obesity when obesity is defined using skinfold thickness instead of BMI, using data from the full series of U.S. National Health Examination Surveys. The results indicate that when one uses skinfold thickness rather than BMI to define obesity, the rise in the prevalence of obesity is detectable 10–20 years earlier. This underscores the importance of examining multiple measures of fatness when monitoring or otherwise studying obesity.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectPolicy Analysis and Managementen_US
dc.titleThe Timing of the Rise in U.S. Obesity Varies With Measure of Fatnessen_US
dc.typearticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics