Quantifying Thermal and Tactile Recovery in Dual-Neurotized Breast Flaps: A Pilot Intrapatient Control Study
Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.
During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.
BACKGROUND: Dual-nerve neurotization of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps may enhance postmastectomy reinnervation, but the early timeline and regional patterns of tactile and thermal recovery remain incompletely defined. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-institution study (January 2024-September 2025) of women undergoing immediate dual-neurotized DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Anterior and lateral intercostal branches (T3/T4) were coapted to medial and lateral flap donor nerves (T10-T12). Objective sensory testing was performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 9 months. Tactile thresholds were normalized to each breast's baseline and reported as percent recovery. Thermal perception (hot 52°C; cold 12°C) was analyzed as regional accuracy. All analyses were performed within-breast. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (43 breasts) were included. Composite tactile recovery increased from 44.9% ± 29.2% at 3 months to 55.5% ± 27.0% at 6 months and 64.2% ± 24.8% at 9 months (all P < 0.001). Regional recovery followed a superomedial pattern. By 9 months, outer-superior (85.6%) and outer-medial (85.9%) regions were not different from baseline (P > 0.05), whereas the NAC (46.0%) and inferior regions (41%-65%) remained reduced (P < 0.001). Thermal recovery improved over time. Cold accuracy increased to 48% ± 20% by 9 months (P < 0.001), with only the superior region approaching baseline (P > 0.05). Hot accuracy recovered more robustly (9 months: 67% ± 28%; P < 0.001), with superior, medial, and inferior regions reaching baseline equivalence (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-neurotization yields progressive tactile and thermal recovery within 9 months, most pronounced in the superior and medial breast, establishing early benchmarks for sensory outcomes after dual-neurotized DIEP reconstruction.