Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
DigitalCollections@ILR
ILR School
  1. Home
  2. ILR School
  3. Centers, Institutes, Programs
  4. Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies (CAHRS)
  5. CAHRS ResearchLink
  6. It's Not What Was Said - But How It Was Said

It's Not What Was Said - But How It Was Said

File(s)
No2_14_ResearchLink_Livingston_081014.pdf (3.49 MB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/73689
Collections
CAHRS ResearchLink
Author
Livingston, Beth
Schilpzand, Pauline
Erez, Amir
Abstract

Key Findings: Individuals chose a favorable outcome for a new company, new product, or new employee significantly less often after hearing advocating messages from nonnative accented speakers as opposed to from speakers with standard American accents. What's more, those individuals who hold a stronger pro-American bias are even more likely to approve of its content when spoken by American Speakers who do not speak with a foreign accent. Those with low pro-American bias showed no such choice preference. Non-standard accented messages may violate expectations regarding business norms and may therefore be distracting to listening. Although recent research by Huang and colleagues (2013) suggests that individuals with nonnative accents may be passed over for promotion because of stereotyping regarding ability or competence, there was no support for this theory in this research.

Date Issued
2014-08-01
Keywords
accents
•
bias
•
outcomes
•
promotion
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance