A Rebuttal to Borchgrevink’s Criticism of Our Meta-Analytic Recommendations

Lynn, Michael; Mullen, Brian

A Rebuttal to Borchgrevink’s Criticism of Our Meta-Analytic Recommendations

File(s)

Lynn73_A_rebuttal.pdf (104.78 KB)

Permanent Link(s)

https://hdl.handle.net/1813/72357

Collections

SHA Articles and Chapters

Author

Lynn, Michael

Mullen, Brian

Abstract

Borchgrevink presented flawed arguments against our (Lynn & Mullen) previous recommendation that hospitality researchers employ meta-analytic techniques other than those of Hunter and Schmidt. The problems with his criticisms are briefly discussed in this article.

Date Issued

1998-01-01

Keywords

meta-analysis

•

fixed effects

•

random effects

Rights

Required Publisher Statement: © SAGE. Final version published as: Lynn, M., & Mullen, B. (1998). A rebuttal to Borchgrevink’s criticism of our meta-analytic recommendations. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 22(1), 102-105. DOI: 10.1177/109634809802200110. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.

Type

article