Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Cornell SC Johnson College of Business
  3. Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration
  4. School of Hotel Administration Collection
  5. SHA Articles and Chapters
  6. Why Recommend a Brand Face-to-Face but not on Facebook? How Word-Of-Mouth on Online Social Sites Differs From Traditional Word-of-Mouth

Why Recommend a Brand Face-to-Face but not on Facebook? How Word-Of-Mouth on Online Social Sites Differs From Traditional Word-of-Mouth

File(s)
Chun11_Why_recommend_a_brand.pdf (853.55 KB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/72042
Collections
SHA Articles and Chapters
Author
Eisingerich, Andreas B.
Chun, HaeEun Helen
Liu, Yeyi
Jia, He (Michael)
Bell, Simon J.
Abstract

We examine the conceptual difference between consumer electronic word-of-mouth on online social sites (sWOM) such as Facebook and traditional face-to-face word-of-mouth (WOM). We find that consumers are less willing to engage in sWOM than WOM. Such a difference in willingness to offer word-of-mouth can be explained by social risk associated with different communication modes. We show that the difference between people’s desire to engage in sWOM and WOM is mediated by perceived social risk and amplified when social risk is made salient. Furthermore, we show that consumers’ need to self-enhance mitigates the difference in willingness to offer sWOM versus WOM.

Date Issued
2015-01-01
Keywords
word-of-mouth
•
social media
•
social risk
•
self-enhancement need
Related DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.004
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: © Elsevier. Final version published as: Eisingerich, A. B., Chun, H., Liu, Y., Jia, H., & Bell, S. J. (2015). Why recommend a brand face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional word-of-mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 120-128. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.004
This version of the work is released under at Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance