Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Weill Cornell Medicine
  3. Medical College Research and Papers
  4. Department of Ophthalmology
  5. Keratoprosthesis Indications, Outcomes, and Future Directions

Keratoprosthesis Indications, Outcomes, and Future Directions

Access Restricted

Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.

During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.

File(s)
41251419.pdf (321.88 KB)
No Access Until
2026-10-02
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/123098
Collections
Department of Ophthalmology
Author
Razavi, P.
Vingopoulos, F.
Dohlman, T.H.
Starr, C.E.
Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive review of keratoprosthesis (KPro), emphasizing the Boston KPro's development, design, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes, while highlighting unresolved challenges and future research directions. METHODS: A narrative literature review was conducted to examine the evolution of KPro, assess commonly used artificial corneas, and analyze current technologies. Specific emphasis was placed on the Boston Keratoprosthesis. RESULTS: The review identified key areas for improvement in Boston KPro, including enhancement of titanium backplates to reduce retroprosthetic membrane formation, better adhesion between the corneal graft and backplate, and refinement of donor graft preparation to prevent corneal melting. Challenges in glaucoma monitoring because of unreliable intraocular pressure measurements were noted. Adjunctive strategies such as optimized vancomycin use, antifungal prophylaxis, drug-releasing contact lenses, and biologic therapies were explored. Cost-containment and accessibility issues were also addressed, along with emerging innovations in KPro design. CONCLUSIONS: Keratoprosthesis represents a viable alternative for patients unsuitable for traditional corneal transplantation. Ongoing research into surgical techniques, material science, prophylaxis, and design improvements will be critical to enhancing patient outcomes, minimizing complications, and expanding global access to KPro.

Journal / Series
Cornea
Volume & Issue
45(1)
Date Issued
2025-10-02
Publisher
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Keywords
WCM Library Coordinated Deposit
•
Humans
•
Corneal Diseases/surgery
•
Prostheses and Implants
•
Cornea/surgery
•
Artificial Organs
•
Prosthesis Implantation/methods
•
Prosthesis Design
•
Boston KPro
•
artificial cornea
•
corneal transplantation
•
keratoprosthesis
•
review
Related DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000004005
Previously Published as
Razavi P, Vingopoulos F, Dohlman TH, Starr CE. Keratoprosthesis Indications, Outcomes, and Future Directions. Cornea. 2025;45(1):130-135. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000004005. PMID: 41251419.
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Rights URI
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance