eCommons

 

Vulnerability and environmental risk assessment

Other Titles

Abstract

David Andow provides examples of environmental risk assessment (ERA), their uses and acceptability to validate environmental policy. When ERA is carried out, the public is more likely to accept policy decisions. However, it is imperfect and could be improved by including cultural significance as part of ERA. Polarization of opinions results from the fact that some people see mostly benefits and some people see mostly risks and everyone balances risks and benefits differently. It’s a social phenomenon with no agreement about how we weigh the factors involved and, therefore, it is impossible to reach consensus.

Journal / Series

Volume & Issue

Description

Sponsorship

Date Issued

2011

Publisher

NABC

Keywords

Agricultural nanotechnology; food safety; food security; sustainability; global food security; developing world needs; risk assessment; threats; animal diseases; plant pathogens;

Location

Effective Date

Expiration Date

Sector

Employer

Union

Union Local

NAICS

Number of Workers

Committee Chair

Committee Co-Chair

Committee Member

Degree Discipline

Degree Name

Degree Level

Related Version

Related DOI

Related To

Related Part

Based on Related Item

Has Other Format(s)

Part of Related Item

Related To

Related Publication(s)

Link(s) to Related Publication(s)

References

Link(s) to Reference(s)

Previously Published As

Government Document

ISBN

ISMN

ISSN

Other Identifiers

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Types

book chapter

Accessibility Feature

Accessibility Hazard

Accessibility Summary

Link(s) to Catalog Record